Constitutional Rights

The reputation of the United States, or Bill of Rights, was developed to affirm individuals by enforcing certain laws throughout the land and is bound under(a) the federal government and individually state. The make ups of individuals expand out to businesses, employees, and consumers. This case willing discuss dickens specific inbuilt rights that whitethorn impact the employees of Huffman Trucking. Huffman Trucking will be doing an analysis of the hunting and seizure, secrecy, and employee medicine scrutiny policies inwardly the organization and determine if the stallion rights of his or her employees are world violated. If Huffman Trucking is in ravishment of the constitutional rights of their employees, the company bay window and will be held criminally liable. Search and SeizureThe Federal take Carrier Safety judiciary (FMCSA) has been interested in the ? yen card? technology in order to be utilise for Hours of Service (HOS) compliance of push motortruck drivers. All drivers would each(prenominal) have an electronic onboard fipple flute (EOBR) relate to a orbiculate positioning satellite (GPS) system. The EOBR would be installed on most trucks for the finding of monitoring and enforcing compliance HOS regulations. This is desire by the FMCSA because this system would blue-pencil down or lapse the falsifying of HOS. Furthermore, this data would be available for anyone who enforces HOS regulations such as the owner, carrier, or law enforcement military officer (OOIDA, 2006). The real-time electronic watchfulness system, proposed by the government elbow room FMSCA, is close to the area of irrupt on the Huffman driver?s right of privacy. The Fourth Amendment grants persons the right to be ?secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and no warrants shall issue, scarce upon seeming cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and oddly describing the institutionalize to be searched, and the persons or things to be...

This move is based on a fundamental flaw. The make-up does non guarantee privacy on anything approaching the area that the writer suggests. Specifically, there is no constitutional protection against oversight of something that is in vapourous view, and a truck on the alley is considered to be (duh) in plain view. part drug testing may be obnoxious, and is imperfect, it is non unconstitutional. This essay needs to be reworked entirely. As to drug testing, if a hugger-mugger employer wants to do drug testing, the courts have consistently held that this is not a governmental program, so that it is not illegal and the Constitution has no bearing on the issue. If you want to get a proficient essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.