Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations betwixt group proletariat defraud?ict and group relationship get word?ict
KYOOSANG CHOI1 AND BONGSOON CHO2*
1 2
Department of production line Administration, Sookmyung Womens University, Seoul, South Korea Graduate School of Business, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea
Summary
Although previous(prenominal) research have reported strong and positive intercorrelations between group task hustle?ict and group relationship confidence trick?ict, several different theoretical rationales exist for the positive associate and the empirical literature remains equivocal. To clarify the causal linkage between the two types of con?ict, we derived seven models specifying how group task and relationship con?ict can be related to each other, including some rival explanations. We tested the competing models using a longitudinal panel design, with data collected from 74 project teams comprising a total of 388 students. The results indicated that relationship con?ict led to an increased ensuant task con?ict through negative group affect.
depute con?ict, however, predicted a subsequent relationship con?ict under(a) a speci?c context, that is, groups that had lower levels of self-assertion among the members. Copyright # 2010 jakes Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Keywords: task con?ict; relationship con?ict; intragroup trust; competing hypotheses testing
Introduction
Beyond past debates over whether con?ict is bad or not, several authors have advanced to the point of what type of con?ict is detrimental or bene?cial to groups (e.g., Amason, 1996; Guetzkow & Gyr, 1954; Jehn, 1994). One prominent typology of con?ict has been make as to whether it is task-related/substantive (task con?ict) or socioemotional/interpersonal (relationship con?ict). Task con?ict is primarily related to performing tasks, which is practically proposed to...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment