The first scenario was somewhat a mayor having trouble deciding what choice to take shape about a proposal for a large heart and resort in the town bringing in $ one hundred fifty million in tourism yearly, new jobs, and an economic boost. The nightfall is the place to build because there is a breast feeding alkali on the site. My decisions for this scenario are as follows: consequentialism: mayor should go beforehand with the proposal because even though it will hurt cxxx people it will booster hundreds more and it will help boost the economy. Basically, the good is outweighing the bad. I believe that this is the most ethical choice for this philosophical approach.
Without this boost this town could shut pile and become a ghost town because families will pay back to move to find new jobs to survive. Deontology approach: mayor should go forward with proposal because city is suffering financially. This is the most ethical choice for this philosophical approach because the mayor needs to root his decision on what is needed, not the consequences of his action. However, I think that the mayor should find a new place for the nursing home. A place that is either just as good as the old one or better. The mayor has an obligation to his city and the people in it and that includes the 130 people at the nursing home. Virtue Ethics: mayor has taken an oath to deal all members of the community, including all the people and employees at the nursing...If you want to entrance a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment